Top Six Most Common WMS Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
We’ve looked at common warehouse management software go live pitfalls before, so let’s now zoom out and review common WMS mistakes to avoid. The below list comes from polling our WMS experts on what common errors and issues they are seeing out in the field.
- WMS mistakes to avoid number one too many legacy processes. Sometimes it’s skimping on buying the shiny new scanner that supports the fancy bar-codes, but more commonly this happens when “leftover” processes are kept to keep users happy and to avoid having to spend time training them on the new flow(s). Whether in the name of streamlining or adding new features, generally processes are changed for a good reason in new versions and it behooves the warehouse manager to adopt them (barring instances of bugged versions) into the SOP. Another good reason to disallow them is dated process flows that often come with equally dated code behind them usually involving more customizations, which can be tricky to support and maintain. Even further risky are the “off the books” workarounds which don’t touch the WMS, and obviously these should be banned in your warehouse or distribution center.
- Relying too much on outside vendors versus in-house personnel. There should be at least some knowledge in-house, so when the major fires need to be put out you don’t always have to wait on your vendor. It’s hugely helpful from a change management perspective at every step of the WMS journey, from implementation/upgrades, support/maintenance, and every-day usage. Your people are the most well versed on your setup and processes while having the most skin in the game, and so they would best know how to squeeze every drop of fruitful functionality from the WMS based on your warehouse’s demands. Ideally there would be more than one wizened WMS sage amongst your team.
- Lack of a regular order reconciliation process. This tends to be an issue with warehouses that deal with many smaller orders rather then fewer larger ones, as those small orders can sometimes get lost in the shuffle and end up waiting around to be shipped. It occurs so often that there is a term for it called “shrinkage” that’s expressed in the form of a percentage. You must have an official, regular process to validate that all of the orders from the ERP system matches what’s in the WMS. At the very bare-bones least this should be done seasonally for smaller warehouses, though larger warehouses with many smaller orders will need to validate more often possibly even weekly. You would also be well advised to have an official SOP to address discrepancies; which happen due to damage, receiving errors, theft, or mischievous ghosts. Ok, not so much the latter. Encourage fewer of those pesky discrepancies via rewarding the “most accurate and safe” personnel, improving receiving checks, and taking the appropriate security measures to safeguard inventory,
- Spending too much time on edge cases and rare “exception flows” at the expense of losing focus on the key processes. Our top WMS expert insists that on too many occasions he’s witnessed warehouse personnel getting lost in rabbit-hole sidetracks while larger issues go unnoticed. He added that it tends to be more pronounced with people who have theoretical rather than practical experience, and so newbie personnel could be more susceptible. Your managers shouldn’t be hashing out what color of tape-grip to use on the RF scanner guns (admittedly an extreme edge case example), and instead their time would be better spent reviewing the layout and optimizing space utilization.
- WMS mistakes to avoid number five neglecting testing. Don’t strictly rely on manual testing and/or prayers, you should regularly test your supply chain systems to identify errors and validate business processes before production is impacted – as it reduces your business risk. We have a strong recommendation for a complete, low-code test automation solution that makes creating and maintaining test cases as easy as possible, and with a basic-yet-powerful, streamlined interface and readable test cases we encourage you to reach out to us and see for yourself.
- Not paying attention to the latest technology, whether it’s hardware or WMS versions. Keep your industry ear to the ground, and take into account which new tech supports your processes, what would work well with your WMS, and at the end of the day what saves your operation time and money. For example, picking is an area that has greatly improved with newer technologies like voice-picking. Don’t let your competition get their customer orders out faster because you weren’t paying attention to the furious march of progress in the supply chain world.
You might wonder why “unrealistic timelines” isn’t listed as wms mistakes to avoid , and that’s because it’s often a result of one or more of the above. You didn’t adequately test the new patch, the users weren’t trained in advance, and a leftover legacy process slowed things down and so the timeline was blown. Did we miss something above? Drop us a line and let us know!
This post was written by:
James Prior Sales Ops Manager James has been working in software pre-sales and implementation since 2000, and more recently settled into working with a pre-sales team and occasionally writing blog posts. Drop him a line at: james.prior[at]tryonsolutions[dot]com.
The strategic planning stage is obviously critical for WMS implementations, and one commonly glossed over aspect is multi-warehouse configurations. The implementation team is focused on the success of the first site with both budget and timeline crunches in...
Your company has taken an important step towards the future by investing in warehouse management software. One of the major drivers behind this may have included increasing the operational efficiency of both labor and physical space by harnessing the real-time...
Maximizing WMS Value – One of the largest Cold Storage 3PLs in the world teamed with Tryon Solutions
One of the largest Cold Storage 3PLs in the world's fearless CIO teamed up with Tryon Solutions, working with our team for application support and staff augmentation, and everything was unifed into Blue Yonder WMS.
An efficient operation is no longer a “nice to have” in this era of labor shortages and ruthless competition. We recently toured the warehouse of a large electronics company located in the Southern United States that saved 35,000 US dollars a month...
How do we know if our warehouse or distribution center is running as expeditiously as possible? Accounting department touts great numbers, warehouse personnel are clearly working hard, and everything “looks and feels” right, so isn’t that good enough? You...